Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Friday, February 3, 2012

Possession and demonic influence

Possession and demonic influence
Holy Scripture distinguishes between possession and demonic influence, just as both are differentiated from mental and neurologic illness (Matt. 4:24, 9:32; Mark 1:34; Luke 7:21, 8:2). Because of the especially complicated nature of humanity, an exact explanation of the essence of possession is difficult. It is clear, however, that it is distinct from simple demonic influence, by which a spirit of darkness tries to incline the will of a person to sin. In that condition a person maintains sovereignty over his acts, and one who encounters temptation can expel it by prayer. Possession is also distinct from that demonic influence by which the devil takes control of one's reason and will.
Evidently, by possession an evil spirit gains power over the nerves that provide motor-control of an organism, as if inserting itself between the body and soul, so that a person loses control over his movements and actions. However, it follows that with possession an evil spirit does not have full control over the spiritual faculties of the possessed: those faculties only appear to be unable to reveal themselves. The soul remains able to think and feel on its own, but it is completely powerless to control bodily functions.
Imagine that the soul is like a pianist and the body is like a piano. One may, then, compare the evil spirit to a malicious gorilla that has climbed between the pianist and his instrument and crazily pounds the keys. Not having control over their own bodies, the possessed appear to be the victims of the evil spirit who enthralled them, and, therefore, the possessed appear not to be responsible for their acts. They are the slaves of the evil spirit.
Possession may take different external forms. Sometimes the possessed storm about and pulverize everything nearby, bringing terror to those around them. In this form they occasionally display inhuman strength, as, for example, the possessed Gadarene, who broke whatever chains were used to try to fetter him (Mark 5:4). And they cause physical harm to themselves, like the youth who threw himself into fire or water at the new moon (Matt. 17:15). But occasionally possession displays itself in a quieter form, when people lose for a time their natural abilities. So, for example, the Gospels tell of the possessed mute who began to speak normally again as soon as the Lord freed him of a demon. Or there is the example of the deformed woman who was able to straighten herself after the Lord freed her from a devil. This unfortunate person lived with a bent-over posture for eighteen years (Luke 13:11).
In some instances the possessed display clairvoyance and the ability to prophesy. So, for example, there is the well-known instance in the book of Acts of the young woman fortuneteller, a servant who earned a good income for her masters by telling the future to people. When the Apostle Paul expelled the demon from her, she lost this ability (Luke 16:16-19). Although possession began to disappear with the spreading of the Christian faith, nevertheless it exists even today.
What leads to possession, and who gives the right to an evil spirit to gain control of a person and to torture him? According to the opinion of Prof. Kurt Koch, a German pastor who spent forty years of his life on the problem of possession and wrote a series of serious studies on that theme, in all the instances known to him the reason for possession was a fascination with the occult: either the person himself was involved with the occult at some time in his life, or he turned to servants of the occult for help of some kind, or someone in his family had earlier been involved with the occult. By the occult we mean such activities as the calling of spirits, spiritualism, fortune-telling and going to fortune-tellers, yoga, extrasensory perception, psychic healing, white and black magic, and, in general, activities in which a person turns toward the servants of fallen spirits (even though not consciously). In this way people involved with the occult put in danger not only themselves but also their children and grandchildren.
In our time, a time of turning away from Christianity and of increasing fascination with the occult, a greater and greater quantity of people begin to fall under the power of evil spirits. It is true that psychiatrists are embarassed to recognize the existence of evil spirits, and, as a rule, they put cases of possession into one or another of the categories of natural psychological illness. But the believing Christian must understand that no kind of medicine and psychotherapy are able to expel evil spirits. Here the power of God is essential.
Distinctive symptoms of possession that distinguish it from natural psychological disorders are described here below (Kurt E. Koch, Demonology Past and Present, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1973, pp. 31-52.):
  • Turning away from everything holy and related to God: Holy Communion, the Cross, the Bible, holy water, icons, prosphoras, incense, prayer, and so forth. Moreover, the possessed feels the presence of a holy object even when it is hidden from view; it irritates him, makes him sick, and even brings him to a state of violent behavior.
  • Change of voice: This symptom is not observed in cases of normal psychological disorders. Because speech is controlled by the brain, over which the demons do not have complete control, but only over the vocal chords, the sound of the words that come out of the mouth of the possessed is unnatural.
  • Clairvoyance: Demons do not know the future, just as the angels don't know it: it is known only to the Lord God. However, demons know the past and see much more of the present than normal people. Being spirits, they are able to nearly instantly communicate to the clairvoyant that which is happening far away, even in another part of the world, so that to others present it might seem as if the clairvoyant person knows the future. When the clairvoyant predicts the future, the predictions are always only guesses. The demons, having a vast experience of life and knowing much more about people, sometimes are able to successfully predict what will happen. Of course they are often mistaken. Besides that, sometimes their predictions are fulfilled not because they were ordained to happen but because the person himself, inspired by something regarding his future, begins unconsciously to strive toward it and in this way facilitates the realization of the prediction.
  • Instant healing: A psychiatrist might need many years to heal a patient suffering from a mental disorder. Liberation from a demon happens in a moment, after which all the signs of possession disappear and the person becomes normal.
  • Instant transmigration: There is a danger that an evil spirit inhabiting someone is able to transmigrate instantly into either the person who is trying to expel him or into members of the family of the possessed. This symptom is distinct from the danger of contagion to which doctors and psychiatrists are exposed. It is known that people who are continually involved with the mentally ill can themselves begin to display different psychological abnormalities. In this situation the patient himself does not benefit from any reduction of that which "infects" his doctor. But in instances of demonic transmigration, the person who had been possessed is completely liberated from possession at the same time that another person just as suddenly falls under the action of this spirit.
The Lord Jesus Christ gave to His disciples powerful means for the expulsion of demons; however, not everyone should undertake this task. From the New Testament there is revealed one striking fact in relation to evil spirits, namely that they absolutely are not able to withstand the name of Christ: the Lord Jesus Christ has a complete and irresistible power over them. During the earthly life of the Lord, His Apostles noted that a certain person had expelled demons by the name of Christ. Confused, they told Jesus about this and asked His permission to forbid that man to use His name. But the Lord answered them: "Forbid him not; for he that is not against us is for us" (Luke 9:50). Evidently, this unknown man truly believed in Christ, although he held himself aloof.
However, it is dangerous for an ordinary person to enter into battle with the unclean spirits, even having the weapon of the name of Christ. The book of Acts tells of the tremendous impression produced on everyone by the accomplishment of miracles by the Apostles and, in part, by the expulsion of demons. And so, the sons of a Jewish priest named Sceva, themselves not Christian but performing exocisms for the sake of profit, wanted to try a new method, the one that the Apostles used: they started to call on the name of Christ to drive out the demon from some possessed person. Suddenly the possessed said to them: "Jesus I know, and Paul I know; but who are ye?" And here he threw himself at the exorcists, and having overpowered them, he brought such force to bear on them that they ran from the house naked and unmercifully beaten (Acts 19:14-17).
Thus, one can see that it is necessary to call on the name of Christ with great faith and reverence - for the sake of someone's salvation and not for some practical goal or from vanity. In such a situation it is especially important to oneself to be defended by the strength of Christ that comes from a Christian way of life. In general, the matter of the expulsion of demons is best of all left to people empowered for this by the Church — priests, bishops, and spiritual elders. Any personal enthusiam and daring in this matter are extraordinarily dangerous. The devil is a very dangerous and crafty enemy. A person presumptuously entering into open battle with him can pay very dearly for his thoughtlessness.
Demonic influence is distinguished from possession in that in the case of demonic influence the devil seizes the very reason and will of a person. In the case of possession the devil enslaves a person's body, but his reason and will remain relatively free, although weakened. Of course the devil is not able to enslave our reason and will coercively. He achieves this subjugation gradually, to the degree that the person himself falls under the devil's influence through his own aversion to God or through a sinful life.
An example of this diabolic, demonic influence can be seen in the traitor Judas. The words of the Gospel, "Then entered Satan into Judas" (Luke 22:3), speak not about the possession of the disciple-traitor but about the enslavement of his will. Initially, Judas subscribed to the kind and unselfish motives of the Apostles. But in a short time he cooled toward Christ and became disenchanted with the usefulness of his mission. So that his efforts would not completely go to waste, he began to secretly reward himself from the general cashbox, to which kind people had contributed for the needs of the Apostles and for aid for the poor. He himself did not notice how the devil gradually darkened his consciousness and began to direct his will. Finally, at the Last Supper the devil completely conquered the unfortunate disciple and pulled him first to vile betrayal and then to suicide.
We see another example of demonic influence in the Jewish leaders and scribes who were antagonistic toward Christ. They disputed and rejected all that He said, and they censured and ridiculed all that was greatest and most noble that He did. These proud men did not see how the devil controlled their consciousness and will in order to hinder the salvation of mankind. And this is the reason the Lord said to them: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do" (John 8:44). Over the period of the history of the Church, there have been many similar antagonists to God, especially in the days of the Revolution in much-suffering Russia.
People under demonic influence are not simply people ignorant in a religious sense or ordinary sinners; these are people "In whom the god of this world hath blinded their minds" (2 Cor. 4:4) and whom he uses in the fight against God. The possessed are the pitiable victims of the evil one; those under demonic influence are his active servants.

thanks to

http://www.orthodoxphotos.com/readings/threshold/possession.shtml


Exorcism

Another Weapon Against the Devil : Exorcism

By Archimandrite Vasilios Bakoyiannis

What a Tibetan Occultist Saw

In 1970, an occultist from Tibet visited Athens. As he was walking along the street, he saw, by divine dispensation, devils who had attached themselves to people.

There was a devil on the neck, another on the ears, another on the nose, another on the mouth and so on. But the occultist also saw something that set him thinking, namely, that the devils were unable to approach priests. They went all around them, circling to find an opening, but were unable to do so.

“Who are these people with beards and black clothing?” the occultist asked a passerby.

“They are the priests of our Church, etc.” explained the other.

“And if you want to see a lot of them, and good ones at that, go to the Holy Mountain.”

He went to the Holy Mountain, where the monks directed him to Father Paisios (+ 1994). As a result, the occultist became aware of certain things. He repented. He was baptized . He became a Christian and took the name Theodore.

Why couldn’t the devil attach himself to priests? Because they belong to Christ’s priesthood. And through this office, they perform sacraments, which, as we shall see, cause the devil to tremble.

“Three things I Fear”

Our holy Fathers fought the devil hand to hand. Very often they talked to him and learned his “secrets.” In one such discussion, the devil was forced to confess to an ascetic, “There are three things I fear. First, what the Christians hang about their necks (the Cross). Second, the bath they take in church (confession), and third, what they eat and drink in church (Holy Communion).” Now note this: he feared these things so much that he wouldn’t even refer to them directly. And the devil added to the holy ascetic: “What I fear most of all is what the Christians eat and drink in church, provided, of course, they do so with a clear conscience.”

We are like fire-breathing lions to the demons when we take communion (says St John Chrysostom). “As lions breathing fire, so do we depart from that table, having become terrible to he demons.”

A message

“Three things I fear,” said the devil. Yet these three things are all part of Christianity. It’s as if the devil were saying that of all faiths (Buddhism, Islam, etc.) he fears ONLY Christianity, because Christians alone have the appropriate weapons to fight him.

This means the following: Only by Christianity is the devil bound hand and foot. In the other religions he has a free range of action. “For all the gods of the heathens are devils, but the Lord made the heavens" (Ps 95:5). And, “They sacrificed to demons, not to God" (Dt 32:17).

Exorcism

Another very important weapon against the devil is exorcism.

At Baptism, according to the Holy Fathers, the devil is at the centre of the soul of the unbaptized. Through exorcism, he is expelled from the heart and the person is set free. “Depart from him/her, every evil and unclean spirit hidden and lurking in the heart.” So exorcism is a dreadful experience for the devil. He is challenged to depart from his victim. And like it or not, he departs.

Since the exorcism prayers at baptism are so specifically aimed at our salvation, St Symeon of Thessaloniki advises that they be said very clearly and not just once. Otherwise the devil will find a way to trouble the Christian.

In the early Christian Church, the reading of the exorcism prayers was a separate and impressive ritual.

● There were special priests who read the prayers, the “exorcists.”

● They were read many times: “Absorb yourselves in the exorcism prayers,” St Cyril of Jerusalem urged those under instruction for baptism.

● The catechumens covered their eyes and faces, so as not to have their attention distracted (as happens today at the ordination of a deacon, who covers his head and face with a “towel”).

For “Curses” and the Possessed

Our Church uses the exorcism prayers of St Basil the Great and St John Chrysostom, which are read over all those who are suffering from possession of curse.

The late Father Porphyrios, who knew much about demons, used to say about the exorcism prayers:

● They were not to be read unless there was a serious, specific reason.

● They were to be read silently (without those present being able to hear).

● Self-appointed exorcists, and those who read the prayers aloud in public, he berates.

● When the exorcism prayers are not read when and as they should be, then the devil assails the victim, the priest and those present.

Satan Infuriated

When the exorcism prayers are read over someone who is not yet baptized, Satan becomes infuriated. Something similar occurs when they are read over someone who is possessed.

The devil, who is “bombarded” by the prayers, is challenged to depart from his victim. He is called upon to do something he detests. And he becomes very angry!

The Victim

The furious devil takes it out on his victim! He tortures him horribly. He contorts him and makes him writhe.

The Priest / Exorcist

In December, 1996, a lady went to a church in the town of Patras in Greece and asked the priest (who later told the story) to read the exorcism prayers of St Basil the Great. The priest was willing and did as she requested.

As he made his way back home, stones began flying around him. He looked back but could see no one. Then, at midnight, something terrible happened. The whole house began to shake. The plates and the glasses in the kitchen sink were hurled against the wall and smashed. The cupboards in the house crashed to the floor. The priest quickly put on his stole, read the prayers which began “Holy God…” and the wickedness stopped.

It’s quite clear. The demons were infuriated by the exorcism prayers and attacked the “culprit”.

Onlookers

At the time of St John Chrysostom, possessed people would be brought to the Divine Liturgy. Some Christians who were present at one such service were not paying attention and were chatting among themselves. St John, who was an expert in the wiles of the devil, addressed his flock:

“Aren’t you worried, now that you’re making this noise, in case one of these demons leaps out and finds your soul vacant, like a house without a door, and just walks in? Even if you don’t care about your possessed brethren, take pity on yourselves. Close the door of your soul against the evil demon.”

So, when you attend an exorcism without due attention, you could become possessed yourself!

Humility
The experience of our holy Fathers teaches that what draws demons out of people is humility.

There was a father who had a daughter who was possessed. He took her to a hermit to have her restored to health. As soon as the possessed girl saw the hermit, she slapped his face. Not only did he not react but, in accordance with the Lord’s commandment, he offered the other cheek as well. This attitude of his (humility) was a blow to the demon. At once it began to cry: “I’m being driven out by the Lord’s commandment.” The possessed girl was made well again. Thereafter, the elders glorified God and said, “Nothing annihilates the pride of the devil so much as humility.”

A possessed person went to an Elder to be cured. Because the Elder considered himself unworthy, he refused. At the insistence of the relatives of the sick man, however, he relented:

“Get out of God’s creature,” he said to the demon.

“I’m going,” said the demon, “but tell me, who are the sheep and who are the goats?”

“I’m the goats,” said the Elder, brokenly. “As for the sheep, God knows them.”

“Your humility is driving me out!” wailed the possessed person, and he was then cured.

When they took a possessed person to Anthony the Great, he also, great saint though he was, considered himself unworthy of driving out demons. So he sent the possessed person to his disciple Abba Paul the Simple. As the disciple was exorcising the demon, it departed from the victim, crying, “Anthony the Great’s humility is driving me out!”

From the book Confronting the Devil, Magic & the Occult, Orthodox Book Centre, Athens 2003
 
Thanks to: John Sanidopoulos
 
 

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Modus Ponens: Abortion


The Old Testament Commandment states, "Thou shalt not Kill." (Old Testament)

"I have not slain men"  (Ancient Egyptian)*

"In Nastron (Hell) I saw... murderers." (Old Norse)*




"... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."   (14th amendment, US Constitution)



Killing an innocent life is murder. It denies life.

Murder is defined as killing of an innocent life or the taking of any human life.

Killing an Innocent life is not the same as defending oneself or others against oppressors, war-time killing of an enemy who is depriving life and liberties (Genocide,  Occupying/Attacking other nations, etc.). (Though those who kill under these conditions must also confess that they took a life, ask for forgiveness, and return to the Eucharistic life of the Church).
A growing fetus has full human compliment DNA.

Full human compliment DNA is human life.

A growing fetus is a separate life from the mother and not merely a part of the mother’s body.

A growing fetus, as a separate life, is distinct from the mother’s body and has his/her own “Unalienable Rights” apart from the mother. 

A growing fetus has the right to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness according to “Unalienable Rights” or  sovereign rights of man.



Therefore abortion is murder of an innocent human life.
 




II:

If we ask the question, do we have the right to take an innocent life? Most if not all people would say that we do not have that right. Context here is important. Specify the context for abortion and we get a different answer.

What do you call someone in a position of power who takes away people's choices? We would call them tyrants, despots, dictators or oppressors. What would we call someone in power who took people's lives from them?



inspiration for these last few sentences (II) came around the 40 minute mark of the below tube by
Michael Ramsden

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQFzpiTc6j8&feature=related

also thanks to Sir C.S. Lewis.

* The Abolition of Man ~ C.S. Lewis




 

Informal Fallacy: Begging the Question fallacy

Begging the Question fallacy (Petitio Principii) includes premise(s) that are worded differently, similar or equal to what is stated in the conclusion. In other words, the claim of the conclusion is a simple and sometimes cleverly disguised version of the premise or a restatement of the premise in the conclusion. This is also known as circular reasoning.

Example:

Capital Punishment is justified for the crimes of murder and kidnapping because it is quite legitimate and appropriate that someone be put to death for having committed such hateful and inhuman acts.

Conclusion: Capital punishment is justified for the crimes of murder and kidnapping.

Premise: it is quite legitimate and appropriate that someone be put to death for having committed such hateful and inhuman acts.

In other words, without adding any reasonable arguments for why this is so, the arguer is saying that putting someone to death is legitimate and appropriate because it is justified for hateful and inhuman acts. That something like murder is hateful and inhuman is true, but it may not be for all circumstances or all cases that the death penalty should be sought. And kidnapping is also hateful and inhuman but does it warranty the death penalty? Further explanation or more involved reasoning should always help an argument’s case.

Socratic dialogue is the attempt at a more exhaustive debate in order to get at truth claims. Socrates would not let his students off the hook too easily, questioning them to exhaustion.

Some more premises like below may help move the argument out of begging the question and even perhaps question the conclusion:



Hateful acts are those where and innocent person is harmed or murdered

Death penalty can take the person who committed the evil act out of society so that person never hurts anyone again.

Death penalty can save costs of prison incarceration for those who have been judged for a capital crime.

It is Debatable if kidnapping is a capital offense, maybe in some cases?

Murder is the taking of someone else’s life

The Judgment  “an eye for an eye” (Old Testament)  can be a fair trade in such cases, but need not be for every case of murder.

Mercy can also be chosen as in Christ’s example on the cross (New Testament).

There is always hope for forgiveness, reconciliation, and repentance of the person who committed the evil act.



2. Audi makes the best cars in the world. We know these because they have the best German engineers. The reason they have the best engineers is because they can afford to pay them more than other car manufacturers. Obviously, they can pay them more because they make the best cars in the world.

Premise: German engineers are the best engineers because they get paid more because Audi makes the best cars in the world.

Conclusion: Audi makes the best cars in the world.

Thus, Audi makes the best cars in the world because Audi makes the best cars in the world. This is a classic case of circular reasoning.

No proof or evidence is offered as to why the German engineers are the best. Getting paid more does not make you the best engineer. And people that get paid more do not necessarily make the best cars. The opposite case can be made that getting paid too much can make you lazy and a company lazy and less innovative. They could be spending their extra wealth on cake and champagne and not the latest and greatest innovations or parts.

Simply assuming the conclusion is true (directly or indirectly) in the premises does not constitute evidence for that conclusion.

More examples:

1.        

Andy: “God must exist”

Phil: “How do you know?”

Andy:  “Because the Bible says so.”

Phil: “Why should I believe the Bible?”

Andy: “Because the Bible was written by God.”

2.

“If such actions were not illegal, then they would not be prohibited by the law.”

3.

“The belief in God is universal. After all, everyone believes in God.”

4.

Interviewer: “Your resume looks really amazing! But I need another reference”

Chechepay: “Jill can give me a good reference.”

Interviewer: “How can I trust Jill?”

Chechepay: “Shoot, man, I can certify her as a downright honest gal!”

5.

“Since I’m not lying, it follows that I am telling the truth.

6.

“We know that Satan exists, since the Bible says Satan exists.”

7.

“What the Bible says is true, since God wrote it and God never lies.”

8.

“Since firefighters must be strong men willing to face danger every day, it follows that no woman can be a firefighter.”

Thanks to:

Hebrew4Christians.com

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Informal Fallacy: Gamblers Fallacy

This fallacy is committed when we believe that our fortune is soon to change because it follows that bad luck should eventually bring good fortune because over a long period of time things eventually even out.
When a person assumes that a departure will occur from what has previously happened for the sole reason that the law of averages demands it.

X happened
X departs from what is expected to occur on average or over the long term
Therefore, X will come to an end soon

One toss of a coin does not affect the next toss. I may get 7 heads in a row but that does not mean that the next coin toss will bring a tails because of the previous results being heads. There is still a 50-50 change that it will either be heads or tails. To assume that a tails is due because of the previous tosses being heads is to commit the Gamblers fallacy. The results of the previous tosses have no bearing on the next toss.
If a boxer has won 50% of his fights in the last 3 years and has lost the last 7 fights and has 7 fights remaining, we would be wrong to get the idea that he would automatically win the next 7 because he is due for some wins.
Not all predictions are fallacious. If a person has good evidence for his predictions, then they will be reasonable to accept. If someone tosses 9 heads in a row it would be reasonable to conclude that he will not toss another 9 in a row. This is not fallacious because there is an understanding of the laws of probability; 9 successive tosses is unlikely again, not impossible but we can estimate the probability as low. If he concluded that he would not get another 9 in a row because the odds of getting 9 in a row are lower than getting fewer than 9, then his reasoning would be sound. To discern when this fallacy occurs and when it does not comes down to understanding the laws of chance.

Example:
Ben and David are talking:
Ben: “You see that cat over there? It has lost the last 10 races. I will bet that he wins today.
David: “Why? He probably will lose.”
Ben:  “Nah, it’s in the bag. He has won 50% of his races in the last 3 years. This year, he has lost his first 3 races and he has three left. That means he will win the next three. So count it as money in the bank.”
David: “C’mon, are you sure?”
Ben: “Sure, man! He’s due!”
David: “He’s a cat, man?!”

Norman and Demeter are playing Axis and Allies:
Norman has been wiping out Demeter’s airplanes like cake. The die rolls have been good for Norman. Demeter decides that he will risk his remaining planes in one final assault. He thinks that Norman’s luck has to change after all these good rolls. Demeter’s planes are destroyed.
Thanks to:
Hebrews4Christians.com

Job

The Story of Righteous Job the Long-Suffering
Righteous Job the Long-Suffering Prophet (Feast Day - May 6)
In ancient times, east of Palestine, there lived a righteous man by the name of Job. He was a just and good man, who always strove to please God throughout his life. The Lord rewarded him for his piety with great wealth. He had many hundreds of large and thousands of small cattle. His large and close family of seven sons and three daughters comforted him.

But the Devil was jealous of Job. He began to vilify him before God, "Doth Job fear God for nothing?... But put forth Thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse Thee to Thy face." Then God, in order to reveal to all how faithful Job was to Him and in order to teach people patience in their sufferings, permitted the Devil to take away all of Job’s possessions. One day robbers came and drove away all his cattle, slew his servants, and a terrible tornado from the desert destroyed the house in which Job’s children had gathered together, killing them all. Job not only did not complain against God, but he said, "God gave, and God hath taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord."

The Devil, put to shame, was not satisfied with this. Again he began to slander Job, "All a man hath will he give for his life. But put forth Thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh (that is, strike him down with disease), and he will curse Thee to Thy face." God permitted the Devil to deprive Job even of his health, and Job was stricken with the most terrible disease — leprosy. Then even his wife began to persuade him to complain against God. His friends, instead of consolation, only further grieved the innocent sufferer with their unjust suspicions. But Job remained firm, did not lose hope in the mercy of God and only begged the Lord to testify that he was suffering in innocence.

In his discourse with his friends, Job prophesied about the Redeemer and of the future resurrection: "I know that my Redeemer liveth and on the last day He shall raise from the dust this my corrupted skin, and in my flesh I shall see God. I shall see Him myself; mine eyes, and not the eyes of another, shall behold Him" (Job 19:25-27, Septuagint).

After this, God, having shown to all the example of devotion and long-suffering in His servant Job, appeared Himself and commanded his friends, who had regarded Job as a great sinner, to ask for prayers from him for themselves. God rewarded His faithful servant. Job regained his health. He had seven more sons and three daughters, gained back twice as much cattle as he had before, and lived another one hundred and forty years in honor, quietly, piously and happily.

The story of long-suffering Job teaches us that God sends misfortunes not just for sins, but that sometimes God sends misfortunes even to the righteous for an even greater confirmation in goodness, for the shaming of the Devil, and for the glorification of the righteousness of God. The history of the life of Job also reveals to us that earthly welfare does not always accompany a virtuous life for men and teaches us also to be sympathetic to those in misfortune. Job, by his innocent sufferings and patience, foreshadowed the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, in the days of the commemoration of the sufferings of Jesus Christ during Passion Week, this story in the Book of Job is read in church.

Apolytikion in the First Tone
On beholding the riches of Job's virtues, the enemy of the righteous contrived to despoil them; and though he cast down the tower of the Saint's body, he could not plunder the wealth of his spirit, for he found the soul of that blameless one to be fully armed; but as for me, he hath stripped me and led me captive away. Hasten, then, before the end, rescue me from the wily one, O Saviour, and save me.

Kontakion in the Plagal of the Fourth Tone
Thou wast shown forth as blameless, true, God-fearing, just, and sanctified, O thou much-suffering Prophet, all-glorious servant of God, most righteous Job; by thy valiant endurance and thy patience thou gavest instruction to the world. For this cause we all honour and praise thine all-holy memory.


From The Law of God by Seraphim Slobodskoy.
 
Thanks to John Sanidopoulos
http://www.johnsanidopoulos.com/
 

Monday, January 30, 2012

Quote by Socrates ~ useful teaching


"I teach them all the good I can, and recommend them to others from whom I think they will get some moral benefit. And the treasures that the wise men of old have left us in their writings I open and explore with my friends. If we come on any good thing, we extract it, and we set much store on being useful to one another." - Socrates